Know Your Account: Double Graph Inference-based Account De-anonymization on Ethereum
The scaled Web 3.0 digital economy, represented by decentralized finance (DeFi), has sparked increasing interest in the past few years, which usually relies on blockchain for token transfer and diverse transaction logic. However, illegal behaviors, such as financial fraud, hacker attacks, and money...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The scaled Web 3.0 digital economy, represented by decentralized finance
(DeFi), has sparked increasing interest in the past few years, which usually
relies on blockchain for token transfer and diverse transaction logic. However,
illegal behaviors, such as financial fraud, hacker attacks, and money
laundering, are rampant in the blockchain ecosystem and seriously threaten its
integrity and security. In this paper, we propose a novel double graph-based
Ethereum account de-anonymization inference method, dubbed DBG4ETH, which aims
to capture the behavioral patterns of accounts comprehensively and has more
robust analytical and judgment capabilities for current complex and
continuously generated transaction behaviors. Specifically, we first construct
a global static graph to build complex interactions between the various account
nodes for all transaction data. Then, we also construct a local dynamic graph
to learn about the gradual evolution of transactions over different periods.
Different graphs focus on information from different perspectives, and features
of global and local, static and dynamic transaction graphs are available
through DBG4ETH. In addition, we propose an adaptive confidence calibration
method to predict the results by feeding the calibrated weighted prediction
values into the classifier. Experimental results show that DBG4ETH achieves
state-of-the-art results in the account identification task, improving the
F1-score by at least 3.75% and up to 40.52% compared to processing each graph
type individually and outperforming similar account identity inference methods
by 5.23% to 12.91%. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2411.18875 |