A Review of Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Probabilistic Image Segmentation
Advancements in image segmentation play an integral role within the broad scope of Deep Learning-based Computer Vision. Furthermore, their widespread applicability in critical real-world tasks has resulted in challenges related to the reliability of such algorithms. Hence, uncertainty quantification...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Advancements in image segmentation play an integral role within the broad
scope of Deep Learning-based Computer Vision. Furthermore, their widespread
applicability in critical real-world tasks has resulted in challenges related
to the reliability of such algorithms. Hence, uncertainty quantification has
been extensively studied within this context, enabling the expression of model
ignorance (epistemic uncertainty) or data ambiguity (aleatoric uncertainty) to
prevent uninformed decision-making. Due to the rapid adoption of Convolutional
Neural Network (CNN)-based segmentation models in high-stake applications, a
substantial body of research has been published on this very topic, causing its
swift expansion into a distinct field. This work provides a comprehensive
overview of probabilistic segmentation, by discussing fundamental concepts of
uncertainty quantification, governing advancements in the field as well as the
application to various tasks. Moreover, literature on both types of
uncertainties trace back to four key applications: (1) to quantify statistical
inconsistencies in the annotation process due ambiguous images, (2) correlating
prediction error with uncertainty, (3) expanding the model hypothesis space for
better generalization, and (4) Active Learning. An extensive discussion follows
that includes an overview of utilized datasets for each of the applications and
evaluation of the available methods. We also highlight challenges related to
architectures, uncertainty quantification methods, standardization and
benchmarking, and finally end with recommendations for future work such as
methods based on single forward passes and models that appropriately leverage
volumetric data. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2411.16370 |