Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science
This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing Tr...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI
(GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational
science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational
Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing
Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at
the United States. With the rapid advancement of GenAI technologies, including
large language models (LLMs), healthcare institutions face unprecedented
opportunities and challenges. This research explores the current status of
GenAI integration, focusing on stakeholder roles, governance structures, and
ethical considerations by administering a survey among leaders of health
institutions (i.e., representing academic medical centers and health systems)
to assess the institutional readiness and approach towards GenAI adoption. Key
findings indicate a diverse range of institutional strategies, with most
organizations in the experimental phase of GenAI deployment. The study
highlights significant variations in governance models, with a strong
preference for centralized decision-making but notable gaps in workforce
training and ethical oversight. Moreover, the results underscore the need for a
more coordinated approach to GenAI governance, emphasizing collaboration among
senior leaders, clinicians, information technology staff, and researchers. Our
analysis also reveals concerns regarding GenAI bias, data security, and
stakeholder trust, which must be addressed to ensure the ethical and effective
implementation of GenAI technologies. This study offers valuable insights into
the challenges and opportunities of GenAI integration in healthcare, providing
a roadmap for institutions aiming to leverage GenAI for improved quality of
care and operational efficiency. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2410.12793 |