The Devil is in the Sources! Knowledge Enhanced Cross-Domain Recommendation in an Information Bottleneck Perspective
Cross-domain Recommendation (CDR) aims to alleviate the data sparsity and the cold-start problems in traditional recommender systems by leveraging knowledge from an informative source domain. However, previously proposed CDR models pursue an imprudent assumption that the entire information from the...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cross-domain Recommendation (CDR) aims to alleviate the data sparsity and the
cold-start problems in traditional recommender systems by leveraging knowledge
from an informative source domain. However, previously proposed CDR models
pursue an imprudent assumption that the entire information from the source
domain is equally contributed to the target domain, neglecting the evil part
that is completely irrelevant to users' intrinsic interest. To address this
concern, in this paper, we propose a novel knowledge enhanced cross-domain
recommendation framework named CoTrans, which remolds the core procedures of
CDR models with: Compression on the knowledge from the source domain and
Transfer of the purity to the target domain. Specifically, following the theory
of Graph Information Bottleneck, CoTrans first compresses the source behaviors
with the perception of information from the target domain. Then to preserve all
the important information for the CDR task, the feedback signals from both
domains are utilized to promote the effectiveness of the transfer procedure.
Additionally, a knowledge-enhanced encoder is employed to narrow gaps caused by
the non-overlapped items across separate domains. Comprehensive experiments on
three widely used cross-domain datasets demonstrate that CoTrans significantly
outperforms both single-domain and state-of-the-art cross-domain recommendation
approaches. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.19574 |