An Interactive Hands-Free Controller for a Riding Ballbot to Enable Simple Shared Control Tasks
Our team developed a riding ballbot (called PURE) that is dynamically stable, omnidirectional, and driven by lean-to-steer control. A hands-free admittance control scheme (HACS) was previously integrated to allow riders with different torso functions to control the robot's movements via torso l...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Our team developed a riding ballbot (called PURE) that is dynamically stable,
omnidirectional, and driven by lean-to-steer control. A hands-free admittance
control scheme (HACS) was previously integrated to allow riders with different
torso functions to control the robot's movements via torso leaning and
twisting. Such an interface requires motor coordination skills and could result
in collisions with obstacles due to low proficiency. Hence, a shared controller
(SC) that limits the speed of PURE could be helpful to ensure the safety of
riders. However, the self-balancing dynamics of PURE could result in a weak
control authority of its motion, in which the torso motion of the rider could
easily result in poor tracking of the command speed dictated by the shared
controller. Thus, we proposed an interactive hands-free admittance control
scheme (iHACS), which added two modules to HACS to improve the speed-tracking
performance of PURE: control gain personalization module and interaction
compensation module. Human riding tests of simple tasks, idle-keeping and
speed-limiting, were conducted to compare the performance of HACS and iHACS.
Two manual wheelchair users and two able-bodied individuals participated in
this study. They were instructed to use "adversarial" torso motions that would
tax the SC's ability to keep the ballbot idling or below a set speed. In the
idle-keeping tasks, iHACS demonstrated minimal translational motion and low
command speed tracking RMSE, even with significant torso lean angles. During
the speed-limiting task with command speed saturated at 0.5 m/s, the system
achieved an average maximum speed of 1.1 m/s with iHACS, compared with that of
over 1.9 m/s with HACS. These results suggest that iHACS can enhance PURE's
control authority over the rider, which enables PURE to provide physical
interactions back to the rider and results in a collaborative rider-robot
synergy. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.19170 |