Variability in Footpoint Mapping of BBFs Using Tsyganenko Models: Impact on Swarm Conjunctions
Magnetospheric-ionospheric coupling studies often rely on multi-spacecraft conjunctions, which require accurate magnetic field mapping tools. For example, linking measurements from the magnetotail with those in the ionosphere involves determining when the orbital magnetic footpoint of THEMIS or MMS...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Magnetospheric-ionospheric coupling studies often rely on multi-spacecraft
conjunctions, which require accurate magnetic field mapping tools. For example,
linking measurements from the magnetotail with those in the ionosphere involves
determining when the orbital magnetic footpoint of THEMIS or MMS intersects
with the footpoint of Swarm. One of the most commonly used tools for tracing
magnetic field lines are the Tsyganenko models. In this study, we aim to
analyze how the footpoint locations are impacted by the inputs parameters of
these models, including solar wind conditions, geomagnetic activity, and the
location in the magnetotail. A dataset of 2394 bursty bulk flows (BBFs)
detected by MMS was mapped to Earth's ionosphere with four different Tsyganenko
models. The MLT position showed a variability of approximately +/-1 MLT across
the models. Footpoint locations were linked to the dawn-dusk position of the
BBFs, with differences between models associated with variations in the
interplanetary magnetic field clock angle. The MLAT values exhibited greater
variability of approximately +/-2{\deg} around the mean value, with a
systematic shift toward higher latitudes observed in two of the four models.
This position is also influenced by the the input parameter of the model
representing the dynamics of Earth's magnetosphere, with larger values
corresponding to lower latitudes. The uncertainty on the footpoint location
impacts the number of conjunctions. Generally, Swarm B exhibited more
conjunctions than Swarm A or C in the northern hemisphere, and less than half
of these conjunctions had Tsyganenko footpoint distances below the typical BBF
footprint size in the ionosphere. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.18494 |