A prospectus on the surface metrology of seborrheic keratoses
Background: Human skin texture has yet to be quantified for diagnostic purposes. Here, the surface metrology of seborrheic keratoses is investigated with an optical profiler. Materials and Methods: Dermatologic specimens of 7 cadavers were prepared. Specimens were molded with polyvinyl siloxane and...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Human skin texture has yet to be quantified for diagnostic
purposes. Here, the surface metrology of seborrheic keratoses is investigated
with an optical profiler. Materials and Methods: Dermatologic specimens of 7
cadavers were prepared. Specimens were molded with polyvinyl siloxane and casts
prepared with resin, which were scanned using a 3D white light optical
profiler. Each scan produced 48 variables, categorized into 3 groups for each
location: control, lesion center, and lesion edge. Images of the histopathology
slides for suspected seborrheic keratoses were reviewed by a
dermatopathologist. Results: The parameters under investigation included border
versus center of keratoses, age, sex, lesion location, degree of sun exposure,
and cause of death. Although some parameters differ between individuals and age
groups, the majority of differences identified between the roughness parameters
measured are a result of sex, sun exposure, and histological diagnosis, listed
in order of increasing importance. Histological diagnosis provided the most
significant, definitive number of individual measurements of areas of roughness
in seborrheic keratoses in comparison to other parts of the skin (regardless if
those were controls or a different pigmented lesion aside from seborrheic
keratoses). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there are quantifiable
patterns of surface textures that can be compared between keratotic and
standard normal skin surfaces. These findings suggest this method has the
potential to be applied as a noninvasive adjunct to current methods of
dermatological diagnosis. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.14250 |