On the number of H-free hypergraphs
Two central problems in extremal combinatorics are concerned with estimating the number $ex(n,H)$, the size of the largest $H$-free hypergraph on $n$ vertices, and the number $forb(n,H)$ of $H$-free hypergraph on $n$ vertices. While it is known that $forb(n,H)=2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}$ for $k$-uniform hy...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two central problems in extremal combinatorics are concerned with estimating
the number $ex(n,H)$, the size of the largest $H$-free hypergraph on $n$
vertices, and the number $forb(n,H)$ of $H$-free hypergraph on $n$ vertices.
While it is known that $forb(n,H)=2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}$ for $k$-uniform
hypergraphs that are not $k$-partite, estimates for hypergraphs that are
$k$-partite (or degenerate) are not nearly as tight.
In a recent breakthrough, Ferber, McKinley, and Samotij proved that for many
degenerate hypergraphs $H$, $forb(n, H) = 2^{O(ex(n,H))}$. However, there are
few known instances of degenerate hypergraphs $H$ for which
$forb(n,H)=2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}$ holds.
In this paper, we show that $forb(n,H)=2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}$ holds for a wide
class of degenerate hypergraphs known as $2$-contractible hypertrees. This is
the first known infinite family of degenerate hypergraphs $H$ for which
$forb(n,H)=2^{(1+o(1))ex(n,H)}$ holds. As a corollary of our main results, we
obtain a surprisingly sharp estimate of
$forb(n,C^{(k)}_\ell)=2^{(\lfloor\frac{\ell-1}{2}\rfloor+o(1))\binom{n}{k-1}}$
for the $k$-uniform linear $\ell$-cycle, for all pairs $k\geq 5, \ell\geq 3$,
thus settling a question of Balogh, Narayanan, and Skokan affirmatively for all
$k\geq 5, \ell\geq 3$. Our methods also lead to some related sharp results on
the corresponding random Turan problem.
As a key ingredient of our proofs, we develop a novel supersaturation variant
of the delta systems method for set systems, which may be of independent
interest. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2409.06810 |