Mechanisms of de-icing by surface Rayleigh and plate Lamb acoustic waves
Acoustic waves (AW) have recently emerged as an energy-efficient ice removal procedure compatible with functional and industrial-relevant substrates. However, critical aspects at fundamental and experimental levels have yet to be disclosed to optimize their operational conditions. Identifying the pr...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Acoustic waves (AW) have recently emerged as an energy-efficient ice removal
procedure compatible with functional and industrial-relevant substrates.
However, critical aspects at fundamental and experimental levels have yet to be
disclosed to optimize their operational conditions. Identifying the processes
and mechanisms by which different types of AWs induce de-icing are some of
these issues. Herein, using model LiNbO3 systems and two types of
interdigitated transducers, we analyze the de-icing and anti-icing efficiencies
and mechanisms driven by Rayleigh surface acoustic waves (R-SAW) and Lamb waves
with 120 and 510 um wavelengths, respectively. Through the experimental
analysis of de-icing and active anti-icing processes and the finite element
simulation of the AW generation, propagation, and interaction with small ice
aggregates, we disclose that Lamb waves are more favorable than R-SAWs to
induce de-icing and/or prevent the freezing of droplets. Prospects for
applications of this study are supported by proof of concept experiments,
including de-icing in an ice wind tunnel, demonstrating that Lamb waves can
efficiently remove ice layers covering large LN substrates. Results indicate
that the de-icing mechanism may differ for Lamb waves or R-SAWs and that the
wavelength must be considered as an important parameter for controlling the
efficiency. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2408.05465 |