Designing High-Occupancy Toll Lanes: A Game-Theoretic Analysis
In this article, we study the optimal design of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. The traffic authority determines the road capacity allocation between HOT lanes and ordinary lanes, as well as the toll price charged for travelers using HOT lanes who do not meet the high-occupancy eligibility criteria...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this article, we study the optimal design of High Occupancy Toll (HOT)
lanes. The traffic authority determines the road capacity allocation between
HOT lanes and ordinary lanes, as well as the toll price charged for travelers
using HOT lanes who do not meet the high-occupancy eligibility criteria. We
develop a game-theoretic model to analyze the decisions of travelers with
heterogeneous preference parameters in values of time and carpool disutilities.
These travelers choose between paying or forming carpools to use the HOT lanes,
or taking the ordinary lanes. Travelers' welfare depends on the congestion cost
of the lane they use, the toll payment, and the carpool disutilities. For
highways with a single entrance and exit node, we provide a complete
characterization of equilibrium strategies and a comparative statics analysis
of how the equilibrium vehicle flow and travel time change with HOT capacity
and toll price. We then extend the single segment model to highways with
multiple entrance and exit nodes. We extend the equilibrium concept and propose
various design objectives considering traffic congestion, toll revenue, and
social welfare. Using the data collected from the HOT lane of the California
Interstate Highway 880 (I-880), we formulate a convex program to estimate the
travel demand and approximate the distribution of travelers' preference
parameters. We then compute the optimal toll design of five segments for I-880
for achieve each one of the four objectives, and compare the optimal solution
with the current toll pricing. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2408.01413 |