The Energy Cost of Artificial Intelligence of Things Lifecycle
Artificial intelligence (AI)coupled with existing Internet of Things (IoT) enables more streamlined and autonomous operations across various economic sectors. Consequently, the paradigm of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) having AI techniques at its core implies additional energy and carbon...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Artificial intelligence (AI)coupled with existing Internet of Things (IoT)
enables more streamlined and autonomous operations across various economic
sectors. Consequently, the paradigm of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT)
having AI techniques at its core implies additional energy and carbon costs
that may become significant with more complex neural architectures. To better
understand the energy and Carbon Footprint (CF) of some AIoT components, very
recent studies employ conventional metrics. However, these metrics are not
designed to capture energy efficiency aspects of inference. In this paper, we
propose a new metric, the Energy Cost of AIoT Lifecycle (eCAL) to capture the
overall energy cost of inference over the lifecycle of an AIoT system. We
devise a new methodology for determining eCAL of an AIoT system by analyzing
the complexity of data manipulation in individual components involved in the
AIoT lifecycle and derive the overall and per bit energy consumption. With eCAL
we show that the better a model is and the more it is used, the more energy
efficient an inference is. For an example AIoT configuration, eCAL for making
$100$ inferences is $1.43$ times higher than for $1000$ inferences. We also
evaluate the CF of the AIoT system by calculating the equivalent CO$_{2}$
emissions based on the energy consumption and the Carbon Intensity (CI) across
different countries. Using 2023 renewable data, our analysis reveals that
deploying an AIoT system in Germany results in emitting $4.62$ times higher
CO$_2$ than in Finland, due to latter using more low-CI energy sources. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2408.00540 |