Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf algebras and Yetter-Drinfeld relative Rota-Baxter operators
Recently, Li, Sheng and Tang introduced post-Hopf algebras and relative Rota-Baxter operators (on cocommutative Hopf algebras), providing an adjunction between the respective categories under the assumption that the structures involved are cocommutative. We introduce Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf algebr...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recently, Li, Sheng and Tang introduced post-Hopf algebras and relative
Rota-Baxter operators (on cocommutative Hopf algebras), providing an adjunction
between the respective categories under the assumption that the structures
involved are cocommutative. We introduce Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf algebras,
which become usual post-Hopf algebras in the cocommutative setting. In analogy
with the correspondence between cocommutative post-Hopf algebras and
cocommutative Hopf braces, the category of Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf algebras
is isomorphic to the category of Yetter-Drinfeld braces introduced by the
author in a joint work with D. Ferri. This allows to explore the connection
with matched pairs of actions and provide examples of Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf
algebras. Moreover, we prove that the category of Yetter-Drinfeld post-Hopf
algebras is equivalent to a subcategory of Yetter-Drinfeld relative Rota-Baxter
operators. The latter structures coincide with the inverse maps of
Yetter-Drinfeld 1-cocycles introduced by the author and D. Ferri, and
generalise bijective relative Rota-Baxter operators on cocommutative Hopf
algebras. Hence the previous equivalence passes to cocommutative post-Hopf
algebras and bijective relative Rota-Baxter operators. Once the surjectivity of
the Yetter-Drinfeld relative Rota-Baxter operators is removed, the equivalence
is replaced by an adjunction and one can recover the result of Li, Sheng and
Tang in the cocommutative case. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2407.17922 |