FP-Inconsistent: Detecting Evasive Bots using Browser Fingerprint Inconsistencies
As browser fingerprinting is increasingly being used for bot detection, bots have started altering their fingerprints for evasion. We conduct the first large-scale evaluation of evasive bots to investigate whether and how altering fingerprints helps bots evade detection. To systematically investigat...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As browser fingerprinting is increasingly being used for bot detection, bots
have started altering their fingerprints for evasion. We conduct the first
large-scale evaluation of evasive bots to investigate whether and how altering
fingerprints helps bots evade detection. To systematically investigate evasive
bots, we deploy a honey site incorporating two anti-bot services (DataDome and
BotD) and solicit bot traffic from 20 different bot services that purport to
sell "realistic and undetectable traffic". Across half a million requests from
20 different bot services on our honey site, we find an average evasion rate of
52.93% against DataDome and 44.56% evasion rate against BotD. Our comparison of
fingerprint attributes from bot services that evade each anti-bot service
individually as well as bot services that evade both shows that bot services
indeed alter different browser fingerprint attributes for evasion. Further, our
analysis reveals the presence of inconsistent fingerprint attributes in evasive
bots. Given evasive bots seem to have difficulty in ensuring consistency in
their fingerprint attributes, we propose a data-driven approach to discover
rules to detect such inconsistencies across space (two attributes in a given
browser fingerprint) and time (a single attribute at two different points in
time). These rules, which can be readily deployed by anti-bot services, reduce
the evasion rate of evasive bots against DataDome and BotD by 48.11% and 44.95%
respectively. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2406.07647 |