Towards Generalizable and Faithful Logic Reasoning over Natural Language via Resolution Refutation
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance in various natural language reasoning tasks. However, they still struggle with performing first-order logic reasoning over formal logical theories expressed in natural language. This is because the previous LLMs-based reasoning syste...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance in various
natural language reasoning tasks. However, they still struggle with performing
first-order logic reasoning over formal logical theories expressed in natural
language. This is because the previous LLMs-based reasoning systems have the
theoretical incompleteness issue. As a result, it can only address a limited
set of simple reasoning problems, which significantly decreases their
generalization ability. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework,
named Generalizable and Faithful Reasoner (GFaiR), which introduces the
paradigm of resolution refutation. Resolution refutation has the capability to
solve all first-order logic reasoning problems by extending reasoning rules and
employing the principle of proof by contradiction, so our system's completeness
can be improved by introducing resolution refutation. Experimental results
demonstrate that our system outperforms previous works by achieving
state-of-the-art performances in complex scenarios while maintaining
performances in simple scenarios. Besides, we observe that GFaiR is faithful to
its reasoning process. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2404.01677 |