Mechanical effects of carboxymethylcellulose binder in hard carbon electrodes

Electrodes in sodium-ion batteries endure mechanical stress during production and application, which can damage these fragile coatings, causing performance inefficiencies and early failure. Binder material provides elasticity in electrode composites to resist fracture, but evaluating the effectivene...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sawhney, Anne, Shittu, Emmanuel, Morgan, Ben, Sackett, Elizabeth, Baker, Jenny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Electrodes in sodium-ion batteries endure mechanical stress during production and application, which can damage these fragile coatings, causing performance inefficiencies and early failure. Binder material provides elasticity in electrode composites to resist fracture, but evaluating the effectiveness of binder is complicated by substrate dependency of these films, while conventional cell tests are beset by multiple electrochemical variables. This work introduces a practical low-cost indentation test to determine the elasticity of hard carbon electrodes containing standard carboxymethylcellulose binder. Using the proposed method, relative elastic moduli of hard carbon electrodes were found to be 0.079 GPa (1% binder), 0.088 GPa (2% binder), 0.105 GPa (3% binder) and 0.113 GPa (4% binder), which were validated using a computational model of film deflection to predict mechanical deformation under stress. Effects on the electrochemical performance of hard carbon anodes were also demonstrated with impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic cycling of sodium half-cells, revealing 8-9% higher capacity retention of anodes with 4% binder compared with those containing 1% binder. These findings suggest binder content in hard carbon electrodes should be selected according to requirements for both cycle life and film flexibility during cell manufacturing.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2403.11668