The absence of monochromatic triangle implies various properly colored spanning trees
An edge-colored graph $G$ is called properly colored if every two adjacent edges are assigned different colors. A monochromatic triangle is a cycle of length 3 with all the edges having the same color. Given a tree $T_0$, let $\mathcal{T}(n,T_0)$ be the collection of $n$-vertex trees that are subdiv...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | An edge-colored graph $G$ is called properly colored if every two adjacent
edges are assigned different colors. A monochromatic triangle is a cycle of
length 3 with all the edges having the same color. Given a tree $T_0$, let
$\mathcal{T}(n,T_0)$ be the collection of $n$-vertex trees that are
subdivisions of $T_0$. It is conjectured that for each fixed tree $T_0$, there
is a function $f(T_0)$ such that for each integer $n\geq f(T_0)$ and each $T\in
\mathcal{T}(n,T_0)$, every edge-colored complete graph $K_n$ without containing
monochromatic triangle must contain a properly colored copy of $T$. We confirm
the conjecture in the case that $T_0$ is a star. A weaker version of the above
conjecture is also obtained. Moreover, to get a nice quantitative estimation of
$f(T_0)$ when $T_0$ is a star requires determining the constraint Ramsey number
of a monochromatic triangle and a rainbow star, which is of independent
interest. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2403.09082 |