comparison of two models to predict vertebral failure loads on the same experimental dataset
CMBBE 2023 Clinical use of finite element analysis requires validation and reproducibility studies. The current study compared two models of vertebral bodies including endplates, on the same experimental dataset and evaluated the influence of the operator on the failure load. Models used were strong...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CMBBE 2023 Clinical use of finite element analysis requires validation and
reproducibility studies. The current study compared two models of vertebral
bodies including endplates, on the same experimental dataset and evaluated the
influence of the operator on the failure load. Models used were strongly
correlated (R2=0.91). The intra-operator reproducibility was 6.4% and 3.5 % for
each model. Both simulated results were close to experimental results. The
differences in performance could be associated to the differences in
segmentation process, mesh (hexahedral vs tetrahedral), material representation
and failure criteria. Linear analysis did not decrease model accuracy.
Comparison with literature for accuracy and precision shows a wide range of
values partly related to the different experimental datasets and the different
modelling approaches. Models benchmark using the same experimental dataset are
needed to go towards clinical applications. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2402.09196 |