Incorporating Zero-Probability Constraints to Device-Independent Randomness Expansion
One of the distinguishing features of quantum theory is that its measurement outcomes are usually unpredictable or, equivalently, random. Moreover, this randomness is certifiable with minimal assumptions in the so-called device-independent (DI) paradigm, where a device's behavior does not need...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the distinguishing features of quantum theory is that its measurement
outcomes are usually unpredictable or, equivalently, random. Moreover, this
randomness is certifiable with minimal assumptions in the so-called
device-independent (DI) paradigm, where a device's behavior does not need to be
presupposed but can be verified through the statistics it produces. In this
work, we explore various forms of randomness that are certifiable in this
setting, where two users can perform two binary-outcome measurements on their
shared entangled state. In this case, even though the
Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell-inequality violation is a pre-requisite
for the generation of DI certifiable randomness, the CHSH value alone does not
generally give a tight bound on the certifiable randomness. Here, we determine
the certifiable randomness when zero-probability constraints are incorporated
into the task of DI randomness expansion for the standard local and global
randomness and the so-called "blind" randomness. Asymptotically, we observe
consistent improvements in the amount of DI certifiable randomness (of all
kinds) as we increase the number zero constraints for a wide range of given
CHSH Bell violations. However, if we further optimize over the allowed CHSH
values, then benefits of these additional constraints over the standard
CHSH-based protocol are only found in the case of global and blind randomness.
In contrast, in the regimes of finite data, these zero constraints only give a
slight improvement in the local randomness rate when compared with all existing
protocols. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2401.08452 |