Euclid Preparation. TBD. Impact of magnification on spectroscopic galaxy clustering
In this paper we investigate the impact of lensing magnification on the analysis of Euclid's spectroscopic survey, using the multipoles of the 2-point correlation function for galaxy clustering. We determine the impact of lensing magnification on cosmological constraints, and the expected shift...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper we investigate the impact of lensing magnification on the
analysis of Euclid's spectroscopic survey, using the multipoles of the 2-point
correlation function for galaxy clustering. We determine the impact of lensing
magnification on cosmological constraints, and the expected shift in the
best-fit parameters if magnification is ignored. We consider two cosmological
analyses: i) a full-shape analysis based on the $\Lambda$CDM model and its
extension $w_0w_a$CDM and ii) a model-independent analysis that measures the
growth rate of structure in each redshift bin. We adopt two complementary
approaches in our forecast: the Fisher matrix formalism and the Markov chain
Monte Carlo method. The fiducial values of the local count slope (or
magnification bias), which regulates the amplitude of the lensing
magnification, have been estimated from the Euclid Flagship simulations. We use
linear perturbation theory and model the 2-point correlation function with the
public code coffe. For a $\Lambda$CDM model, we find that the estimation of
cosmological parameters is biased at the level of 0.4-0.7 standard deviations,
while for a $w_0w_a$CDM dynamical dark energy model, lensing magnification has
a somewhat smaller impact, with shifts below 0.5 standard deviations. In a
model-independent analysis aiming to measure the growth rate of structure, we
find that the estimation of the growth rate is biased by up to $1.2$ standard
deviations in the highest redshift bin. As a result, lensing magnification
cannot be neglected in the spectroscopic survey, especially if we want to
determine the growth factor, one of the most promising ways to test general
relativity with Euclid. We also find that, by including lensing magnification
with a simple template, this shift can be almost entirely eliminated with
minimal computational overhead. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2311.03168 |