Modular Boundaries in Recurrent Neural Networks
Recent theoretical and experimental work in neuroscience has focused on the representational and dynamical character of neural manifolds --subspaces in neural activity space wherein many neurons coactivate. Importantly, neural populations studied under this "neural manifold hypothesis" are...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent theoretical and experimental work in neuroscience has focused on the
representational and dynamical character of neural manifolds --subspaces in
neural activity space wherein many neurons coactivate. Importantly, neural
populations studied under this "neural manifold hypothesis" are continuous and
not cleanly divided into separate neural populations. This perspective clashes
with the "modular hypothesis" of brain organization, wherein neural elements
maintain an "all-or-nothing" affiliation with modules. In line with this
modular hypothesis, recent research on recurrent neural networks suggests that
multi-task networks become modular across training, such that different modules
specialize for task-general dynamical motifs. If the modular hypothesis is
true, then it would be important to use a dimensionality reduction technique
that captures modular structure. Here, we investigate the features of such a
method. We leverage RNNs as a model system to study the character of modular
neural populations, using a community detection method from network science
known as modularity maximization to partition neurons into distinct modules.
These partitions allow us to ask the following question: do these modular
boundaries matter to the system? ... |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.20601 |