Harnessing the Power of LLMs: Evaluating Human-AI Text Co-Creation through the Lens of News Headline Generation
To explore how humans can best leverage LLMs for writing and how interacting with these models affects feelings of ownership and trust in the writing process, we compared common human-AI interaction types (e.g., guiding system, selecting from system outputs, post-editing outputs) in the context of L...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To explore how humans can best leverage LLMs for writing and how interacting
with these models affects feelings of ownership and trust in the writing
process, we compared common human-AI interaction types (e.g., guiding system,
selecting from system outputs, post-editing outputs) in the context of
LLM-assisted news headline generation. While LLMs alone can generate
satisfactory news headlines, on average, human control is needed to fix
undesirable model outputs. Of the interaction methods, guiding and selecting
model output added the most benefit with the lowest cost (in time and effort).
Further, AI assistance did not harm participants' perception of control
compared to freeform editing. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.10706 |