Proof of a conjecture about Parrondo's paradox for two-armed slot machines
The 1936 Mills Futurity slot machine had the feature that, if a player loses 10 times in a row, the 10 lost coins are returned. Ethier and Lee (2010) studied a generalized version of this machine, with 10 replaced by deterministic parameter J. They established the Parrondo effect for a hypothetical...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The 1936 Mills Futurity slot machine had the feature that, if a player loses
10 times in a row, the 10 lost coins are returned. Ethier and Lee (2010)
studied a generalized version of this machine, with 10 replaced by
deterministic parameter J. They established the Parrondo effect for a
hypothetical two-armed machine with the Futurity award. Specifically, arm A and
arm B, played individually, are asymptotically fair, but when alternated
ran-domly (the so-called random mixture strategy), the casino makes money in
the long run. They also considered the nonrandom periodic pattern strategy for
patterns with r As and s Bs (e.g., ABABB if r = 2 and s = 3). They established
the Parrondo effect if r + s divides J, and conjectured it in four other
situations, including the case J = 2 with r >= 1 and s >= 1. We prove the
conjecture in the latter case. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.08935 |