Utilizing Free Clients in Federated Learning for Focused Model Enhancement
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach to learn models on decentralized heterogeneous data, without the need for clients to share their data. Many existing FL approaches assume that all clients have equal importance and construct a global objective based on all clients. W...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach to learn
models on decentralized heterogeneous data, without the need for clients to
share their data. Many existing FL approaches assume that all clients have
equal importance and construct a global objective based on all clients. We
consider a version of FL we call Prioritized FL, where the goal is to learn a
weighted mean objective of a subset of clients, designated as priority clients.
An important question arises: How do we choose and incentivize well aligned non
priority clients to participate in the federation, while discarding misaligned
clients? We present FedALIGN (Federated Adaptive Learning with Inclusion of
Global Needs) to address this challenge. The algorithm employs a matching
strategy that chooses non priority clients based on how similar the models loss
is on their data compared to the global data, thereby ensuring the use of non
priority client gradients only when it is beneficial for priority clients. This
approach ensures mutual benefits as non priority clients are motivated to join
when the model performs satisfactorily on their data, and priority clients can
utilize their updates and computational resources when their goals align. We
present a convergence analysis that quantifies the trade off between client
selection and speed of convergence. Our algorithm shows faster convergence and
higher test accuracy than baselines for various synthetic and benchmark
datasets. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2310.04515 |