Can-SAVE: Mass Cancer Risk Prediction via Survival Analysis Variables and EHR
Specific medical cancer screening methods are often costly, time-consuming, and weakly applicable on a large scale. Advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods greatly help cancer detection but require specific or deep medical data. These aspects prevent the mass implementation of cancer screening...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Specific medical cancer screening methods are often costly, time-consuming,
and weakly applicable on a large scale. Advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI)
methods greatly help cancer detection but require specific or deep medical
data. These aspects prevent the mass implementation of cancer screening
methods. For this reason, it is a disruptive change for healthcare to apply AI
methods for mass personalized assessment of the cancer risk among patients
based on the existing Electronic Health Records (EHR) volume. This paper
presents a novel Can-SAVE cancer risk assessment method combining a survival
analysis approach with a gradient-boosting algorithm. It is highly accessible
and resource-efficient, utilizing only a sequence of high-level medical events.
We tested the proposed method in a long-term retrospective experiment covering
more than 1.1 million people and four regions of Russia. The Can-SAVE method
significantly exceeds the baselines by the Average Precision metric of
22.8%$\pm$2.7% vs 15.1%$\pm$2.6%. The extensive ablation study also confirmed
the proposed method's dominant performance. The experiment supervised by
oncologists shows a reliable cancer patient detection rate of up to 84 out of
1000 selected. Such results surpass the medical screening strategies estimates;
the typical age-specific Number Needed to Screen is only 9 out of 1000 (for
colorectal cancer). Overall, our experiments show a 4.7-6.4 times improvement
in cancer detection rate (TOP@1k) compared to the traditional healthcare risk
estimation approach. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2309.15039 |