Advances in developing deep neural networks for finding primary vertices in proton-proton collisions at the LHC
We are studying the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) to identify and locate primary vertices (PVs) in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. Earlier work focused on finding primary vertices in simulated LHCb data using a hybrid approach that started with kernel density estimators (KDEs) derived heur...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We are studying the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) to identify and locate
primary vertices (PVs) in proton-proton collisions at the LHC. Earlier work
focused on finding primary vertices in simulated LHCb data using a hybrid
approach that started with kernel density estimators (KDEs) derived
heuristically from the ensemble of charged track parameters and predicted
"target histogram" proxies, from which the actual PV positions are extracted.
We have recently demonstrated that using a UNet architecture performs
indistinguishably from a "flat" convolutional neural network model. We have
developed an "end-to-end" tracks-to-hist DNN that predicts target histograms
directly from track parameters using simulated LHCb data that provides better
performance (a lower false positive rate for the same high efficiency) than the
best KDE-to-hists model studied. This DNN also provides better efficiency than
the default heuristic algorithm for the same low false positive rate.
"Quantization" of this model, using FP16 rather than FP32 arithmetic, degrades
its performance minimally. Reducing the number of UNet channels degrades
performance more substantially. We have demonstrated that the KDE-to-hists
algorithm developed for LHCb data can be adapted to ATLAS and ACTS data using
two variations of the UNet architecture. Within ATLAS/ACTS, these algorithms
have been validated against the standard vertex finder algorithm. Both
variations produce PV-finding efficiencies similar to that of the standard
algorithm and vertex-vertex separation resolutions that are significantly
better. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2309.12417 |