Validating corruption risk measures: a key step to monitoring SDG progress
The Agenda 2030 recognises corruption as a major obstacle to sustainable development and integrates its reduction among SDG targets, in view of developing peaceful, just and strong institutions. In this paper, we propose a method to assess the validity of corruption indicators within an Item Respons...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Agenda 2030 recognises corruption as a major obstacle to sustainable
development and integrates its reduction among SDG targets, in view of
developing peaceful, just and strong institutions. In this paper, we propose a
method to assess the validity of corruption indicators within an Item Response
Theory framework, which explicitly accounts for the latent and multidimensional
facet of corruption. Towards this main aim, a set of fifteen red flag
indicators of corruption risk in public procurement is computed on data
included in the Italian National Database of Public Contracts. Results show a
multidimensional structure composed of sub-groups of red flag indicators i.
measuring distinct corruption risk categories, which differ in nature, type and
entity, and are generally non-superimposable; ii. mirroring distinct dynamics
related to specific SDG principles and targets. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2309.01462 |