Nested Multilevel Monte Carlo with Biased and Antithetic Sampling
We consider the problem of estimating a nested structure of two expectations taking the form $U_0 = E[\max\{U_1(Y), \pi(Y)\}]$, where $U_1(Y) = E[X\ |\ Y]$. Terms of this form arise in financial risk estimation and option pricing. When $U_1(Y)$ requires approximation, but exact samples of $X$ and $Y...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We consider the problem of estimating a nested structure of two expectations
taking the form $U_0 = E[\max\{U_1(Y), \pi(Y)\}]$, where $U_1(Y) = E[X\ |\ Y]$.
Terms of this form arise in financial risk estimation and option pricing. When
$U_1(Y)$ requires approximation, but exact samples of $X$ and $Y$ are
available, an antithetic multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) approach has been
well-studied in the literature. Under general conditions, the antithetic MLMC
estimator obtains a root mean squared error $\varepsilon$ with order
$\varepsilon^{-2}$ cost. If, additionally, $X$ and $Y$ require approximate
sampling, careful balancing of the various aspects of approximation is required
to avoid a significant computational burden. Under strong convergence criteria
on approximations to $X$ and $Y$, randomised multilevel Monte Carlo techniques
can be used to construct unbiased Monte Carlo estimates of $U_1$, which can be
paired with an antithetic MLMC estimate of $U_0$ to recover order
$\varepsilon^{-2}$ computational cost. In this work, we instead consider biased
multilevel approximations of $U_1(Y)$, which require less strict assumptions on
the approximate samples of $X$. Extensions to the method consider an
approximate and antithetic sampling of $Y$. Analysis shows the resulting
estimator has order $\varepsilon^{-2}$ asymptotic cost under the conditions
required by randomised MLMC and order $\varepsilon^{-2}|\log\varepsilon|^3$
cost under more general assumptions. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2308.07835 |