Clusternets: A deep learning approach to probe clustering dark energy
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are becoming popular in cosmology for extracting valuable information from cosmological data. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on matter density snapshots to distinguish clustering Dark Energy (DE) from the co...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are becoming popular in cosmology for
extracting valuable information from cosmological data. In this paper, we
evaluate the performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on
matter density snapshots to distinguish clustering Dark Energy (DE) from the
cosmological constant scenario and to detect the speed of sound ($c_s$)
associated with clustering DE. We compare the CNN results with those from a
Random Forest (RF) algorithm trained on power spectra. Varying the dark energy
equation of state parameter $w_{\rm{DE}}$ within the range of -0.7 to -0.99,
while keeping $c_s^2 = 1$, we find that the CNN approach results in a
significant improvement in accuracy over the RF algorithm. The improvement in
classification accuracy can be as high as $40\%$ depending on the physical
scales involved. We also investigate the ML algorithms' ability to detect the
impact of the speed of sound by choosing $c_s^2$ from the set $\{1, 10^{-2},
10^{-4}, 10^{-7}\}$ while maintaining a constant $w_{\rm DE}$ for three
different cases: $w_{\rm DE} \in \{-0.7, -0.8, -0.9\}$. Our results suggest
that distinguishing between various values of $c_s^2$ and the case where
$c_s^2=1$ is challenging, particularly at small scales and when
$w_{\rm{DE}}\approx -1$. However, as we consider larger scales, the accuracy of
$c_s^2$ detection improves. Notably, the CNN algorithm consistently outperforms
the RF algorithm, leading to an approximate $20\%$ enhancement in $c_s^2$
detection accuracy in some cases. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2308.03517 |