Causal thinking for decision making on Electronic Health Records: why and how
Accurate predictions, as with machine learning, may not suffice to provide optimal healthcare for every patient. Indeed, prediction can be driven by shortcuts in the data, such as racial biases. Causal thinking is needed for data-driven decisions. Here, we give an introduction to the key elements, f...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Accurate predictions, as with machine learning, may not suffice to provide
optimal healthcare for every patient. Indeed, prediction can be driven by
shortcuts in the data, such as racial biases. Causal thinking is needed for
data-driven decisions. Here, we give an introduction to the key elements,
focusing on routinely-collected data, electronic health records (EHRs) and
claims data. Using such data to assess the value of an intervention requires
care: temporal dependencies and existing practices easily confound the causal
effect. We present a step-by-step framework to help build valid decision making
from real-life patient records by emulating a randomized trial before
individualizing decisions, eg with machine learning. Our framework highlights
the most important pitfalls and considerations in analysing EHRs or claims data
to draw causal conclusions. We illustrate the various choices in studying the
effect of albumin on sepsis mortality in the Medical Information Mart for
Intensive Care database (MIMIC-IV). We study the impact of various choices at
every step, from feature extraction to causal-estimator selection. In a
tutorial spirit, the code and the data are openly available. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2308.01605 |