Nearly Optimal Dynamic Set Cover: Breaking the Quadratic-in-$f$ Time Barrier

The dynamic set cover problem has been subject to extensive research since the pioneering works of [Bhattacharya et al, 2015] and [Gupta et al, 2017]. The input is a set system $(U, S)$ on a fixed collection $S$ of sets and a dynamic universe of elements, where each element appears in a most $f$ set...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bukov, Anton, Solomon, Shay, Zhang, Tianyi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The dynamic set cover problem has been subject to extensive research since the pioneering works of [Bhattacharya et al, 2015] and [Gupta et al, 2017]. The input is a set system $(U, S)$ on a fixed collection $S$ of sets and a dynamic universe of elements, where each element appears in a most $f$ sets and the cost of each set lies in the range $[1/C, 1]$, and the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximately-minimum set cover under insertions and deletions of elements. Most previous work considers the low-frequency regime, namely $f = O(\log n)$, and this line of work has culminated with a deterministic $(1+\epsilon)f$-approximation algorithm with amortized update time $O(\frac{f^2}{\epsilon^3} + \frac{f}{\epsilon^2}\log C)$ [Bhattacharya et al, 2021]. In the high-frequency regime of $f = \Omega(\log n)$, an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm with amortized update time $O(f\log n)$ was given by [Gupta et al, 2017]. Interestingly, at the intersection of the two regimes, i.e., $f = \Theta(\log n)$, the state-of-the-art results coincide: approximation $\Theta(f) = \Theta(\log n)$ with amortized update time $O(f^2) = O(f \log n) = O(\log^2 n)$. Up to this date, no previous work achieved update time of $o(f^2)$. In this paper we break the $\Omega(f^2)$ update time barrier via the following results: (1) $(1+\epsilon)f$-approximation can be maintained in $O\left(\frac{f}{\epsilon^3}\log^*f + \frac{f}{\epsilon^3}\log C\right) = O_{\epsilon,C}(f \log^* f)$ expected amortized update time; our algorithm works against an adaptive adversary. (2) $(1+\epsilon)f$-approximation can be maintained deterministically in $O\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}f\log f + \frac{f}{\epsilon^3} + \frac{f\log C}{\epsilon^2}\right) = O_{\epsilon,C}(f \log f)$ amortized update time.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2308.00793