Assessing small area estimates via bootstrap-weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor artificial populations
Comparing and evaluating small area estimation (SAE) models for a given application is inherently difficult. Typically, many areas lack enough data to check unit-level modeling assumptions or to assess unit-level predictions empirically; and no ground truth is available for checking area-level estim...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Comparing and evaluating small area estimation (SAE) models for a given
application is inherently difficult. Typically, many areas lack enough data to
check unit-level modeling assumptions or to assess unit-level predictions
empirically; and no ground truth is available for checking area-level
estimates. Design-based simulation from artificial populations can help with
each of these issues, but only if the artificial populations realistically
represent the application at hand and are not built using assumptions that
inherently favor one SAE model over another. In this paper, we borrow ideas
from random hot deck, approximate Bayesian bootstrap (ABB), and k Nearest
Neighbor (kNN) imputation methods to propose a kNN-based approximation to ABB
(KBAABB), for generating an artificial population when rich unit-level
auxiliary data is available. We introduce diagnostic checks on the process of
building the artificial population, and we demonstrate how to use such an
artificial population for design-based simulation studies to compare and
evaluate SAE models, using real data from the Forest Inventory and Analysis
(FIA) program of the US Forest Service. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2306.15607 |