Entanglement Spectrum as a diagnostic of chirality of Topological Spin Liquids: Analysis of an $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ PEPS
Phys. Rev. B 110, 235147 (2024) We address the key question of representation of chiral topological quantum states in (2+1) dimensions (i.e., with non-zero chiral central charge) by Projected Entangled Pair States (PEPS). A noted result (due to Wahl, Tu, Schuch, and Cirac [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 2368...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Phys. Rev. B 110, 235147 (2024) We address the key question of representation of chiral topological quantum
states in (2+1) dimensions (i.e., with non-zero chiral central charge) by
Projected Entangled Pair States (PEPS). A noted result (due to Wahl, Tu,
Schuch, and Cirac [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 236805 (2013)], and Dubail and Read
[Phys. Rev. B 92, 205307 (2015)]) says that this is possible for
non-interacting fermions, but the answer is as yet unknown for interacting
systems. Characteristic counting of degeneracies of low-lying states in the
entanglement spectrum (ES) at fixed transverse momentum of bipartitioned long
cylinders ("Li-Haldane counting") provides often-used supporting evidence for
chirality. However, non-chiral PEPS (with zero chiral central charge), yet with
strong breaking of time-reversal and reflection symmetries, with invariance
under the product of these two operations (i.e., "apparently" chiral states),
are known whose low-lying ES exhibits the same Li-Haldane counting as a chiral
state in certain topological sectors [Kure\v{c}i\'c, Vanderstraeten, and
Schuch, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045116 (2019); Arildsen, Schuch, and Ludwig, Phys.
Rev. B 108, 245150 (2023)]. In the present work, we identify a distinct
indicator and hallmark of chirality in the ES of PEPS with global
$\mathrm{SU}(3)$ symmetry: the splittings of conjugate irreps. We prove that in
the ES of the chiral states conjugate irreps are exactly degenerate, because
the operators that would split them [related to the cubic Casimir invariant of
$\mathrm{SU}(3)$] are forbidden. By contrast, in the ES of non-chiral states,
conjugate splittings are demonstrably non-vanishing. Such a diagnostic provides
an unambiguous and powerful tool to distinguish chiral and non-chiral
topological states in (2+1) dimensions via their entanglement spectra. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2305.13240 |