A Study of Biologically Plausible Neural Network: The Role and Interactions of Brain-Inspired Mechanisms in Continual Learning
Humans excel at continually acquiring, consolidating, and retaining information from an ever-changing environment, whereas artificial neural networks (ANNs) exhibit catastrophic forgetting. There are considerable differences in the complexity of synapses, the processing of information, and the learn...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Humans excel at continually acquiring, consolidating, and retaining
information from an ever-changing environment, whereas artificial neural
networks (ANNs) exhibit catastrophic forgetting. There are considerable
differences in the complexity of synapses, the processing of information, and
the learning mechanisms in biological neural networks and their artificial
counterparts, which may explain the mismatch in performance. We consider a
biologically plausible framework that constitutes separate populations of
exclusively excitatory and inhibitory neurons that adhere to Dale's principle,
and the excitatory pyramidal neurons are augmented with dendritic-like
structures for context-dependent processing of stimuli. We then conduct a
comprehensive study on the role and interactions of different mechanisms
inspired by the brain, including sparse non-overlapping representations,
Hebbian learning, synaptic consolidation, and replay of past activations that
accompanied the learning event. Our study suggests that the employing of
multiple complementary mechanisms in a biologically plausible architecture,
similar to the brain, may be effective in enabling continual learning in ANNs. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2304.06738 |