Starker Effekt von Schnelltests (Strong effect of rapid tests)
This article is a reproduction of a Fraunhofer ITWM report from 28 June 2021 on the contribution of various non-pharmaceutical measures in breaking the 3rd Corona wave in Germany. The main finding is that testing contributed more to the containment of the pandemic in this phase than vaccination or c...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This article is a reproduction of a Fraunhofer ITWM report from 28 June 2021
on the contribution of various non-pharmaceutical measures in breaking the 3rd
Corona wave in Germany. The main finding is that testing contributed more to
the containment of the pandemic in this phase than vaccination or contact
restrictions. The analysis is based on a new epidemiological cohort model that
represents testing, vaccination and contact restrictions by time-varying rates
of detection, vaccination and contacts, respectively.
Only the effectiveness of different vaccines is taken from the literature.
All other parameters are automatically identified in such a way that the
simulated and the published incidences and death rates match. Among these
parameters are incubation time, mean duration of the infectious phase,
mortality rate, as well as two contact rates and one detection rate per week.
Note that we can reconstruct such a high number of parameters only because we
assume that the weekly wave patterns in new infections follow real infection
dynamics, periodically driven by high contact rates on weekdays and lower ones
on weekends. Usually, people assume that the weekly wave patterns are just
reporting artefacts and that weekly mean values are the finest usable data.
One focus of the paper is to quantify the increase in detection rate due to
the introduction of rapid testing in schools. For this purpose, we compare
federal states that differ in the start of school tests and Easter holidays.
There is a clear temporal correlation with the identified detection rates.
Finally, we compare the effect of the individual non-pharmaceutical measures
by replacing one by one the fitted rates of detection, vaccination and contacts
by neutral ones. The increase in the simulated number of actually infected
persons measures the effect of the measure ignored. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2304.05938 |