Bridging the Gap: Applying Assurance Arguments to MIL-HDBK-516C Certification of a Neural Network Control System with ASIF Run Time Assurance Architecture
Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning may soon yield paradigm-shifting benefits for aerospace systems. However, complexity and possible continued on-line learning makes neural network control systems (NNCS) difficult or impossible to certify under the United States Military...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning may soon
yield paradigm-shifting benefits for aerospace systems. However, complexity and
possible continued on-line learning makes neural network control systems (NNCS)
difficult or impossible to certify under the United States Military
Airworthiness Certification Criteria defined in MIL-HDBK-516C. Run time
assurance (RTA) is a control system architecture designed to maintain safety
properties regardless of whether a primary control system is fully verifiable.
This work examines how to satisfy compliance with MIL-HDBK-516C while using
active set invariance filtering (ASIF), an advanced form of RTA not envisaged
by the 516c committee. ASIF filters the commands from a primary controller,
passing on safe commands while optimally modifying unsafe commands to ensure
safety with minimal deviation from the desired control action. This work
examines leveraging the core theory behind ASIF as assurance argument
explaining novel satisfaction of 516C compliance criteria. The result
demonstrates how to support compliance of novel technologies with 516C as well
as elaborate how such standards might be updated for emerging technologies. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2303.15568 |