The human factor: results of a small-angle scattering data analysis Round Robin
A Round Robin study has been carried out to estimate the impact of the human element in small-angle scattering data analysis. Four corrected datasets were provided to participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured on samples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets in dilute d...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A Round Robin study has been carried out to estimate the impact of the human
element in small-angle scattering data analysis. Four corrected datasets were
provided to participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured on
samples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets in dilute
dispersions, and two from powders. Most of the 46 participants correctly
identified the number of populations in the dilute dispersions, with half of
the population mean entries within 1.5% and half of the population width
entries within 40%, respectively. Due to the added complexity of the structure
factor, much fewer people submitted answers on the powder datasets. For those
that did, half of the entries for the means and widths were within 44% and 86%
respectively. This Round Robin experiment highlights several causes for the
discrepancies, for which solutions are proposed. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2303.03772 |