On Sparsification of Stochastic Packing Problems
Motivated by recent progress on stochastic matching with few queries, we embark on a systematic study of the sparsification of stochastic packing problems (SPP) more generally. Specifically, we consider SPPs where elements are independently active with a probability p, and ask whether one can (non-a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Motivated by recent progress on stochastic matching with few queries, we
embark on a systematic study of the sparsification of stochastic packing
problems (SPP) more generally. Specifically, we consider SPPs where elements
are independently active with a probability p, and ask whether one can
(non-adaptively) compute a sparse set of elements guaranteed to contain an
approximately optimal solution to the realized (active) subproblem. We seek
structural and algorithmic results of broad applicability to such problems. Our
focus is on computing sparse sets containing on the order of d feasible
solutions to the packing problem, where d is linear or at most poly. in 1/p.
Crucially, we require d to be independent of the any parameter related to the
``size'' of the packing problem. We refer to d as the degree of the sparsifier,
as is consistent with graph theoretic degree in the special case of matching.
First, we exhibit a generic sparsifier of degree 1/p based on contention
resolution. This sparsifier's approximation ratio matches the best contention
resolution scheme (CRS) for any packing problem for additive objectives, and
approximately matches the best monotone CRS for submodular objectives. Second,
we embark on outperforming this generic sparsifier for matroids, their
intersections and weighted matching. These improved sparsifiers feature
different algorithmic and analytic approaches, and have degree linear in 1/p.
In the case of a single matroid, our sparsifier tends to the optimal solution.
For weighted matching, we combine our contention-resolution-based sparsifier
with technical approaches of prior work to improve the state of the art ratio
from 0.501 to 0.536. Third, we examine packing problems with submodular
objectives. We show that even the simplest such problems do not admit
sparsifiers approaching optimality. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2211.07829 |