Optimizing the Homogeneity and Efficiency of an SOEC Based on Multiphysics Simulation and Data-driven Surrogate Model
Inhomogeneous current and temperature distributions are harmful to the durability of the solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). Segmented SOEC experiments reveal that a high steam utilization, which is favorable for system efficiency, leads to local steam starvation and enhanced the inhomogeneity. It...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Inhomogeneous current and temperature distributions are harmful to the
durability of the solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). Segmented SOEC
experiments reveal that a high steam utilization, which is favorable for system
efficiency, leads to local steam starvation and enhanced the inhomogeneity. It
is necessary to consider inhomogeneity and efficiency jointly in optimization
studies. Three-dimensional (3D) multiphysics models validated with experiments
can simulate the inhomogeneity in a reliable manner, but they are unsuitable
for optimization due to the high computational cost. This study proposes a
method that combines segmented SOEC experiments, multiphysics simulation, and
artificial intelligence to optimize the inhomogeneity and efficiency of SOEC
jointly. A 3D cell model is first built and verified by segmented SOEC
experiments. Then, fast neural network surrogate models are built from the
simulation data and integrated into a multi-objective optimization problem. Its
solutions form a Pareto front reflecting the conflicting relationships among
different objectives. It is found that the down-stream current is 60%-65% of
the up-stream current when the steam utilization is 0.7. To increase the steam
utilization to 0.8, the down-stream current will further drop to 50%-60% of the
up-stream current. The Pareto fronts enable system operators to achieve a
balance between efficiency and inhomogeneity. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2210.13766 |