First-class constraints generate gauge transformations in electromagnetism (reply to Pitts)
Brian Pitts has recently claimed to show via straightforward calculation that, at least in the case of Hamiltonian electromagnetism, an arbitrary first-class constraint ``generates not a gauge transformation, but a bad physical change'' (Annals of Physics 351 (2014) pp.382-406; arXiv:1310....
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Brian Pitts has recently claimed to show via straightforward calculation
that, at least in the case of Hamiltonian electromagnetism, an arbitrary
first-class constraint ``generates not a gauge transformation, but a bad
physical change'' (Annals of Physics 351 (2014) pp.382-406; arXiv:1310.2756).
We show, via a straightforward calculation, that a transformation generated by
an arbitrary first-class constraint relates gauge-equivalent phase space
points, vindicating orthodoxy. Pitts, however, is primarily concerned with
transformations of entire histories, rather than of instantaneous states. We
show that, even in this context, a transformation generated by an arbitrary
first-class constraint is also a gauge transformation, once the empirically
observed electric field is correctly identified via its dynamical interactions
with charge, and not simply given stipulatively as a certain combination of the
potential and its derivatives. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2210.09063 |