Adaptive Contrastive Learning with Dynamic Correlation for Multi-Phase Organ Segmentation

Recent studies have demonstrated the superior performance of introducing ``scan-wise" contrast labels into contrastive learning for multi-organ segmentation on multi-phase computed tomography (CT). However, such scan-wise labels are limited: (1) a coarse classification, which could not capture...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Ho Hin, Tang, Yucheng, Liu, Han, Fan, Yubo, Cai, Leon Y, Yang, Qi, Yu, Xin, Bao, Shunxing, Huo, Yuankai, Landman, Bennett A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent studies have demonstrated the superior performance of introducing ``scan-wise" contrast labels into contrastive learning for multi-organ segmentation on multi-phase computed tomography (CT). However, such scan-wise labels are limited: (1) a coarse classification, which could not capture the fine-grained ``organ-wise" contrast variations across all organs; (2) the label (i.e., contrast phase) is typically manually provided, which is error-prone and may introduce manual biases of defining phases. In this paper, we propose a novel data-driven contrastive loss function that adapts the similar/dissimilar contrast relationship between samples in each minibatch at organ-level. Specifically, as variable levels of contrast exist between organs, we hypothesis that the contrast differences in the organ-level can bring additional context for defining representations in the latent space. An organ-wise contrast correlation matrix is computed with mean organ intensities under one-hot attention maps. The goal of adapting the organ-driven correlation matrix is to model variable levels of feature separability at different phases. We evaluate our proposed approach on multi-organ segmentation with both non-contrast CT (NCCT) datasets and the MICCAI 2015 BTCV Challenge contrast-enhance CT (CECT) datasets. Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, our proposed contrastive loss yields a substantial and significant improvement of 1.41% (from 0.923 to 0.936, p-value$
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2210.08652