The Field Q and the Equality 0.999 . . . = 1 from Combinatorics of Circular Words and History of Practical Arithmetics
We reconsider the classical equality 0.999. .. = 1 with the tool of circular words, that is: finite words whose last letter is assumed to be followed by the first one. Such circular words are naturally embedded with algebraic structures that enlight this problematic equality, allowing it to be consi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We reconsider the classical equality 0.999. .. = 1 with the tool of circular
words, that is: finite words whose last letter is assumed to be followed by the
first one. Such circular words are naturally embedded with algebraic structures
that enlight this problematic equality, allowing it to be considered in Q
rather than in R. We comment early history of such structures, that involves
English teachers and accountants of the first part of the xviii th century, who
appear to be the firsts to assert the equality 0.999. .. = 1. Their level of
understanding show links with Dubinsky et al.'s apos theory in mathematics
education. Eventually, we rebuilt the field Q from circular words, and provide
an original proof of the fact that an algebraic integer is either an integer or
an irrational number. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2210.07951 |