Analysis of ground level enhancement events of 29 September 1989; 15 April 2001 and 20 January 2005
We present the results of analyses of the ground level enhancements (GLEs) of cosmic ray (CR) events of 29 September 1989; 15 April 2001 and 20 January 2005. This involve examination of hourly raw CR counts of an array of neutron monitors (NMs) spread across different geographical latitudes and long...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We present the results of analyses of the ground level enhancements (GLEs) of
cosmic ray (CR) events of 29 September 1989; 15 April 2001 and 20 January 2005.
This involve examination of hourly raw CR counts of an array of neutron
monitors (NMs) spread across different geographical latitudes and longitudes.
Using awk script and computer codes implemented in R-software, the pressure
corrected raw data plots of the NMs were grouped into low-, mid-, and,
high-latitudes. The results show both similarities and differences in the
structural patterns of the GLE signals. In an attempt to explain why the CR
count during the decay phase of GLEs is always higher than the count before
peak, we interpreted all counts prior to the peak as coming from direct solar
neutrons and those in the decay phase including the peak as coming from
secondary CR neutrons generated by the interactions of primary CRs with the
atoms and molecules in the atmosphere. We identified NMs that detected these
primary neutrons and found that they are close in longitudes. Previous authors
seemingly identified these two species as impulsive and gradual events.
Although there are a number of unexplained manifestations of GLE signals, some
of the results suggest that geomagnetic rigidity effectively determines the
intensity of CRs at low- and mid-latitudes. Its impact is apparently
insignificant in high-latitude regions. Nevertheless, the results presented
should be validated before making any firm statements. Principally, the
contributions of the ever-present and intractable CR diurnal anisotropies to
GLE signals should be accounted for in future work. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2208.12572 |