Hyperdimensional Computing vs. Neural Networks: Comparing Architecture and Learning Process
Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC) has obtained abundant attention as an emerging non von Neumann computing paradigm. Inspired by the way human brain functions, HDC leverages high dimensional patterns to perform learning tasks. Compared to neural networks, HDC has shown advantages such as energy effic...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC) has obtained abundant attention as an
emerging non von Neumann computing paradigm. Inspired by the way human brain
functions, HDC leverages high dimensional patterns to perform learning tasks.
Compared to neural networks, HDC has shown advantages such as energy efficiency
and smaller model size, but sub-par learning capabilities in sophisticated
applications. Recently, researchers have observed when combined with neural
network components, HDC can achieve better performance than conventional HDC
models. This motivates us to explore the deeper insights behind theoretical
foundations of HDC, particularly the connection and differences with neural
networks. In this paper, we make a comparative study between HDC and neural
network to provide a different angle where HDC can be derived from an extremely
compact neural network trained upfront. Experimental results show such neural
network-derived HDC model can achieve up to 21% and 5% accuracy increase from
conventional and learning-based HDC models respectively. This paper aims to
provide more insights and shed lights on future directions for researches on
this popular emerging learning scheme. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2207.12932 |