Cohomology of SL(3,Z) with coefficients in the standard representation

This paper is a natural continuation of a joint paper with Bajpai, Harder and Moya Giusti \cite{BHHM}, even though it began as an answer to Goncharov's question. It that paper, we had complete description for all representations except for odd symmetric powers and their dual ones. For those rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Horozov, Ivan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper is a natural continuation of a joint paper with Bajpai, Harder and Moya Giusti \cite{BHHM}, even though it began as an answer to Goncharov's question. It that paper, we had complete description for all representations except for odd symmetric powers and their dual ones. For those representations we were left with two options: certain one dimensional module is a ghost space or not. Here we find the $H^2(SL_3(\Z),V_3)$ has ghost classes. It means that it is generated by a class from the cohomology of the Borel subgroup. With the techniques developed here, we show that the $d_2$ map of the spectral sequence for the boundary cohomology of $GL_4(\Z)$ is non-trivial if and only if there is a ghost class in $GL_3(\Z)$ (see Propositions 11 and 12.) We use a result of Elbaz-Vincent, Gangl and Soule to show that a spectral sequence related to $GL_4(\Z)$ does not degenerate at $E_2$-level. Then $d_2$ is non-trivial. Therefore, we obtain that $H^2(SL_3(\Z),V_3))$ is a ghost space, where $V_3$ is the standard representation.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2207.12276