Case study on quantum convolutional neural network scalability
One of the crucial tasks in computer science is the processing time reduction of various data types, i.e., images, which is important for different fields -- from medicine and logistics to virtual shopping. Compared to classical computers, quantum computers are capable of parallel data processing, w...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the crucial tasks in computer science is the processing time reduction
of various data types, i.e., images, which is important for different fields --
from medicine and logistics to virtual shopping. Compared to classical
computers, quantum computers are capable of parallel data processing, which
reduces the data processing time. This quality of quantum computers inspired
intensive research of the potential of quantum technologies applicability to
real-life tasks. Some progress has already revealed on a smaller volumes of the
input data. In this research effort, I aimed to increase the amount of input
data (I used images from 2 x 2 to 8 x 8), while reducing the processing time,
by way of skipping intermediate measurement steps. The hypothesis was that, for
increased input data, the omitting of intermediate measurement steps after each
quantum convolution layer will improve output metric results and accelerate
data processing. To test the hypothesis, I performed experiments to chose the
best activation function and its derivative in each network. The hypothesis was
partly confirmed in terms of output mean squared error (MSE) -- it dropped from
0.25 in the result of classical convolutional neural network (CNN) training to
0.23 in the result of quantum convolutional neural network (QCNN) training. In
terms of the training time, however, which was 1.5 minutes for CNN and 4 hours
37 minutes in the least lengthy training iteration, the hypothesis was
rejected. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2207.07160 |