Uniqueness of phase retrieval from three measurements
In this paper we consider the question of finding an as small as possible family of operators $(T_j)_{j\in J}$ on $L^2(R)$ that does phase retrieval: every $\varphi$ is uniquely determined (up to a constant phase factor) by the phaseless data $(|T_j\varphi|)_{j\in J}$. This problem arises in various...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper we consider the question of finding an as small as possible
family of operators $(T_j)_{j\in J}$ on $L^2(R)$ that does phase retrieval:
every $\varphi$ is uniquely determined (up to a constant phase factor) by the
phaseless data $(|T_j\varphi|)_{j\in J}$. This problem arises in various fields
of applied sciences where usually the operators obey further restrictions. Of
particular interest here are so-called {\em coded diffraction paterns} where
the operators are of the form $T_j\varphi=\mathcal{F}m_j\varphi$, $\mathcal{F}$
the Fourier transform and $m_j\in L^\infty(R)$ are "masks". Here we explicitely
construct three real-valued masks $m_1,m_2,m_3\in L^\infty(R)$ so that the
associated coded diffraction patterns do phase retrieval. This implies that the
three self-adjoint operators
$T_j\varphi=\mathcal{F}[m_j\mathcal{F}^{-1}\varphi]$ also do phase retrieval.
The proof uses complex analysis.We then show that some natural analogues of
these operators in the finite dimensional setting do not always lead to the
same uniqueness result due to an undersampling effect. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2205.08753 |