Comparison of Evaluation Metrics for Landmark Detection in CMR Images
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) images are widely used for cardiac diagnosis and ventricular assessment. Extracting specific landmarks like the right ventricular insertion points is of importance for spatial alignment and 3D modeling. The automatic detection of such landmarks has been tackled by mu...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) images are widely used for cardiac diagnosis
and ventricular assessment. Extracting specific landmarks like the right
ventricular insertion points is of importance for spatial alignment and 3D
modeling. The automatic detection of such landmarks has been tackled by
multiple groups using Deep Learning, but relatively little attention has been
paid to the failure cases of evaluation metrics in this field. In this work, we
extended the public ACDC dataset with additional labels of the right
ventricular insertion points and compare different variants of a heatmap-based
landmark detection pipeline. In this comparison, we demonstrate very likely
pitfalls of apparently simple detection and localisation metrics which
highlights the importance of a clear detection strategy and the definition of
an upper limit for localisation-based metrics. Our preliminary results indicate
that a combination of different metrics is necessary, as they yield different
winners for method comparison. Additionally, they highlight the need of a
comprehensive metric description and evaluation standardisation, especially for
the error cases where no metrics could be computed or where no lower/upper
boundary of a metric exists. Code and labels:
https://github.com/Cardio-AI/rvip_landmark_detection |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2201.10410 |