The ComMA Dataset V0.2: Annotating Aggression and Bias in Multilingual Social Media Discourse
In this paper, we discuss the development of a multilingual dataset annotated with a hierarchical, fine-grained tagset marking different types of aggression and the "context" in which they occur. The context, here, is defined by the conversational thread in which a specific comment occurs...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, we discuss the development of a multilingual dataset annotated
with a hierarchical, fine-grained tagset marking different types of aggression
and the "context" in which they occur. The context, here, is defined by the
conversational thread in which a specific comment occurs and also the "type" of
discursive role that the comment is performing with respect to the previous
comment. The initial dataset, being discussed here (and made available as part
of the ComMA@ICON shared task), consists of a total 15,000 annotated comments
in four languages - Meitei, Bangla, Hindi, and Indian English - collected from
various social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Telegram.
As is usual on social media websites, a large number of these comments are
multilingual, mostly code-mixed with English. The paper gives a detailed
description of the tagset being used for annotation and also the process of
developing a multi-label, fine-grained tagset that can be used for marking
comments with aggression and bias of various kinds including gender bias,
religious intolerance (called communal bias in the tagset), class/caste bias
and ethnic/racial bias. We also define and discuss the tags that have been used
for marking different the discursive role being performed through the comments,
such as attack, defend, etc. We also present a statistical analysis of the
dataset as well as results of our baseline experiments with developing an
automatic aggression identification system using the dataset developed. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2111.10390 |