Study of The Relationship Between Public and Private Venture Capitalists in France: A Qualitative Approach
This research focuses on the study of relationships between public and private equity investors in France. In this regard, we need to apprehend the formal or informal nature of interactions that can sometimes take place within traditional innovation networks (Djellal \& Gallouj, 2018). For this,...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This research focuses on the study of relationships between public and
private equity investors in France. In this regard, we need to apprehend the
formal or informal nature of interactions that can sometimes take place within
traditional innovation networks (Djellal \& Gallouj, 2018). For this, our
article mobilizes a public-private partnerships approach (PPPs) and the
resource-based view theory. These perspectives emphasize the complementary role
of disciplinary and incentive mechanisms as well as the exchange of specific
resources as levers for value creation. Moreover, these orientations crossed
with the perspective of a hybrid form of co-investment allow us to build a
coherent and explanatory framework of the mixed syndication phenomenon. Our
methodology is based on a qualitative approach with an interpretative aim,
which includes twenty-seven semi-structured interviews. These data were
subjected to a thematic content analysis using Nvivo software. The results
suggest that the relationships between public and private Venture capitalists
(VCs) of a formal or informal nature, more specifically in a syndication
context, at a national or regional level, are representative of an
''economico-cognitive'' (Farrugia, 2014, page 6) approach to networking and
innovation. Moreover, the phenomenon of mixed syndication reveals a context of
hybridization of public and private actors that would allow the private VCs to
benefit from the distribution of wealth when the company develops its
innovation. We can also identify a process related to a quest for legitimacy on
the part of the public actor characterized by its controlling role within the
public-private partnership (Beuve and Saussier, 2019). Finally, our study has
some limitations. One example is the measurement of the effects of
relationships on ''visible'' or ''invisible'' innovation (Djellal \& Gallouj,
2018, page 90). |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2110.09098 |