Mass Composition of UHECRs from $X_{\rm max}$ Distributions Recorded by the Pierre Auger and Telescope Array Observatories

In this paper we infer the mass composition of the ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) from measurements of $X_{\rm max}$ distributions recorded at the Pierre Auger (2014) and Telescope Array (TA) (2016) Observatories, by fitting them with all possible combinations of Monte Carlo (MC) templates f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Arsene, Nicusor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper we infer the mass composition of the ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) from measurements of $X_{\rm max}$ distributions recorded at the Pierre Auger (2014) and Telescope Array (TA) (2016) Observatories, by fitting them with all possible combinations of Monte Carlo (MC) templates from a large set of primary species (p, He, C, N, O, Ne, Si and Fe), as predicted by EPOS-LHC, QGSJETII-04 and Sibyll 2.1 hadronic interaction models. We use the individual fractions of nuclei reconstructed from one experiment in each energy interval to build equivalent MC $X_{\rm max}$ distributions, which we compare with the experimental $X_{\rm max}$ distributions of the other experiment, applying different statistical tests of compatibility. The results obtained from both experiments confirm that the mass composition of the UHECRs is dominated ($\gtrsim$$70\%$) by protons and He nuclei {in the energy range investigated $\lg E (\rm eV)$ = [17.8--19.3] (Auger) and $\lg E \rm (eV)$ = [18.2--19.0] (TA).} The indirect comparisons between the $X_{\rm max}$ distributions recorded by the two experiments show that the degree of compatibility of the two datasets is good, even excellent in some high energy intervals, especially above the ankle ($\lg E (\rm eV) \sim 18.7$). However, our study reveals that, at low energies, further effort in data analysis is required in order to harmonize the results of the two experiments.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03626