Mass Composition of UHECRs from $X_{\rm max}$ Distributions Recorded by the Pierre Auger and Telescope Array Observatories
In this paper we infer the mass composition of the ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) from measurements of $X_{\rm max}$ distributions recorded at the Pierre Auger (2014) and Telescope Array (TA) (2016) Observatories, by fitting them with all possible combinations of Monte Carlo (MC) templates f...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper we infer the mass composition of the ultra high energy cosmic
rays (UHECRs) from measurements of $X_{\rm max}$ distributions recorded at the
Pierre Auger (2014) and Telescope Array (TA) (2016) Observatories, by fitting
them with all possible combinations of Monte Carlo (MC) templates from a large
set of primary species (p, He, C, N, O, Ne, Si and Fe), as predicted by
EPOS-LHC, QGSJETII-04 and Sibyll 2.1 hadronic interaction models. We use the
individual fractions of nuclei reconstructed from one experiment in each energy
interval to build equivalent MC $X_{\rm max}$ distributions, which we compare
with the experimental $X_{\rm max}$ distributions of the other experiment,
applying different statistical tests of compatibility. The results obtained
from both experiments confirm that the mass composition of the UHECRs is
dominated ($\gtrsim$$70\%$) by protons and He nuclei {in the energy range
investigated $\lg E (\rm eV)$ = [17.8--19.3] (Auger) and $\lg E \rm (eV)$ =
[18.2--19.0] (TA).} The indirect comparisons between the $X_{\rm max}$
distributions recorded by the two experiments show that the degree of
compatibility of the two datasets is good, even excellent in some high energy
intervals, especially above the ankle ($\lg E (\rm eV) \sim 18.7$). However,
our study reveals that, at low energies, further effort in data analysis is
required in order to harmonize the results of the two experiments. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2109.03626 |